When Euthanasia Becomes Murder
Government is tipping the scales toward suicide as a means to solve the challenges of life.
A healthcare ethics professor, Theo Boer, served from 2005 to 2014 “on a euthanasia review board in the Netherlands.” Boer said: “In those years, I saw the Dutch euthanasia practice evolve from death being a last resort to death being a default option.”
As the recent case of Zoraya ter Beek, as well as many others, demonstrates, the slippery slope of euthanasia has iced. We are careening out of control toward a dystopian future where the government tips the scales toward suicide as a means to solve the challenges of life.
In Canada, a Paralympian was offered euthanasia when she asked for a stairlift. State-encouraged suicide is not the same as exercising bodily autonomy.
In 2017, I wrote a version of the following essay for Intellectual Takeout.
In the Netherlands, an elderly woman suffering from dementia was held down against her protests as a lethal injection was administered by a doctor. In the days before her “euthanasia” she repeatedly said, “I don’t want to die.” The doctor was cleared of wrongdoing.
Another elderly woman in the Netherlands was euthanized due to her supposed “unhappiness” about living in a nursing home. This despite testimony from the staff that she was often “content and friendly.”
Doctors in the Netherlands and Belgium have also routinely euthanized patients with depression. Now, a law to “legalize euthanasia for perfectly healthy people who hold ‘a well-considered opinion that their life is complete’” is being considered in the Netherlands.
In the US, Washington, DC and nine states—California, Colorado, Maine, Montana, New Mexico, New Jersey, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington—euthanasia is legal. Should we be concerned?
Advocates tell us euthanasia allows a patient to “skip the suffering and die with dignity.” Based on this, euthanasia advocates suggest that until we walk in the shoes of someone who wants assistance in dying, who are we to deny them “death with dignity”? The idea that an individual has an “inalienable right” to use their body as they see fit has some appeal.
Liz Carr is the creator of the hit British anti-euthanasia play Assisted Suicide: The Musical. Carr grew up with and still suffers from severe disabilities. In her youth she visited some emotional “dark places” where she saw no hope. Born in 1972, Carr feels lucky that euthanasia was not yet on the cultural radar. She believes that the movement can encourage disabled individuals to believe their life “isn’t worth living.”
In the Wall Street Journal, Sohrab Ahmari conducted a compelling interview with Carr who argues we “don’t know what assisted suicide means or what the consequences are.” We just clap along to a mindless mantra “the right to die, the right to die.”
Why shouldn’t we exercise “self-determination” and choose how and when we die?
Ahmari cautions, “The death-with-dignity case is often based not on the lived experience of people with disabilities, but on the subjective judgments of others.”
“Legalizing euthanasia doesn’t empower you,” argues Carr. “It empowers doctors.”
Ahmari adds, “In the context of the modern welfare state, that means empowering agents of the government.”
Carr feels strongly that giving the state power to decide invites pressure on the disabled with seemingly well-meaning words, such as “I understand you, and I support your right to go.” Carr’s point is crucial since it is a rare individual who is not responsive to the social environment in which they are immersed.
If you believe Carr’s concerns about empowering doctors to end your life is overblown, consider Nazi Germany. In Nazi Germany, physicians were the most “Nazified professional group in Germany” and had no problem carrying out all aspects of the Nazi extermination program against the disabled and mentally ill. Of course, Hitler’s extermination program against the disabled was couched in socially acceptable terms. The murders were “mercy deaths” provided to “patients considered incurable according to the best available human judgment of their state of health.”
Carr believes the word “dignity” has been hijacked by those arguing for “death with dignity.” What is the source of dignity? She asserts, “Your state of health, mental or physical, has no bearing on your dignity.” Many of us who know individuals who are ill or disabled and live rich lives with dignity. All of us know from our own lesser challenges that our mental or physical health does not have to determine our dignity.
We are still a long way from Nazi Germany, but if “dignity derives from good health and ability” then are we not sliding down a slippery slope where doctors, as agents of the state, can discard the “weak and vulnerable”?
Viktor Frankl wrote of finding meaning even when facing a hopeless situation:
We must never forget that we may also find meaning in life even when confronted with a hopeless situation, when facing a fate that cannot be changed. For what then matters is to bear witness to the uniquely human potential at its best, which is to transform a personal tragedy into a triumph, to turn one's predicament into a human achievement.
On a forced labor detail, while starving and freezing, Frankl wrote,
The dawn was grey around us; grey was the sky above; grey the snow in the pale light of dawn; grey the rags in which my fellow prisoners were clad, and grey their faces. I was again conversing silently with my wife, or perhaps I was struggling to find the reason for my sufferings, my slow dying. In a last violent protest against the hopelessness of imminent death, I sensed my spirit piercing through the enveloping gloom. I felt it transcend that hopeless, meaningless world, and from somewhere I heard a victorious "Yes" in answer to my question of the existence of an ultimate purpose…
"Et lux in tenebris lucet" - and the light shineth in the darkness.
Our study of Frankl’s Man’s Search for Meaning begins on April 27th. Upgrade to paid today and read all previous sessions of Mindset Shifts U as well as all new sessions.
I’ve been observing this trend. It’s very hard to watch. Even meaning itself has been weaponized, externalized… often substituted with usefulness. I also observe that our medical system has trained us to do just about anything to escape suffering… and even discomfort. We have to learn to navigate discomfort again.
Barry, my Sister and I cared from our Mother full time before she passed at 100. At 97 she had mild stroke which resulted in an increased level of care. We gave our Mother our entire being as she did caring for us throughout our childhood. Even amidst her physical limitations, She smiled and laughed with us everyday. She gave us a purpose and we did our best to brighten her days and make her feel loved. Our Parents were devout in their Catholic Faith and transferred the importance of caring for Family and friends to us. Loving the Lord our Creator, loving our Neighbors as ourselves, and honoring our Parents was paramount. These principle are common amongst believers in most religions. Sadly, our Governments are promoting a Godless, sterile orthodoxy which promotes the discarding of human life without regard to it’s Divinity and Sacredness. Showing great love through the personal sacrifice of caregiving can make life worth living for both caregiver and the cared for. It is an ultimate Divine purpose. An ultimate expression of Meaning.